Google has launche a Programme recently named Google Internet Bus Project -Explore the world of Internet to give you a first hand experience of what the Internet has to offer you.The Internet Bus Project is an attempt educate people about what the Internet is, and how it may be beneficial to their lives, by taking the Internet experience to them through a customised Internet-enabled bus, which will travel to several towns and cities across India.The bus is currently at Chennai
Get all our blog postings delivered in your inbox.Type your email address Here
For more Click Teentweensblog
For more Click Teentweensblog

Microsoft is busily promoting Windows 7, its next operating system and successor to the much-maligned Vista.
At the 2009 Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer has announced a free public beta of the new OS, which reportedly will be less of a resource hog than Vista and may even run well on netbooks. The Windows 7 public beta is reportedly “feature complete” and will expire on Aug. 1, 2009.
Microsoft says Windows 7 is a leaner, stripped-down OS that will require as little as 1GB of memory. Then again, it’s fair to be skeptical here. Vista has the same memory requirement but runs sluggishly on systems with 1GB of RAM.
But there’s more to Windows 7 that faster performance, Microsoft says. There are plenty of under-the-hood changes, including a revamped Vista kernel and a less-annoying User Account Control that you can configure to post fewer security warnings. The Windows interface will undergo some changes as well.
Windows 7 may even bring a slight shift away from the traditional, desktop-oriented operating system to one that incorporates elements of Microsoft’s upcoming Azure “cloud” OS.
Whatever Windows 7 brings, XP fans may remain stubbornly loyal to their OS. Dell continues to offer XP to its customers, albeit for a surcharge, and user interest in switching from Vista to XP remains high.
Source
For more Click Teentweensblog
Get all our blog postings delivered in your inbox.Type your email address Here

The search giant Google has officially launched its long-rumoured entry in the browser arena. Termed Chrome, the new browser will take on Microsoft’s Internet Explorer and Mozilla Foundation’s Firefox.
Google’s entry in the browser market further embitters the long-going Microsoft-Google battle for Web supremacy. At the same time, it once again hots up the browser battles even as Microsoft has launched IE8 beta 2 and Firefox 3.0. But few people know why a browser might become an important weapon in the Google arsenal.
Get all our blog postings delivered in your inbox.Type your email address Here
For more fun Click Teentweensblog
6:27 - Announcer welcomes Les Hinton, CEO of Dow Jones. Applauding Walt and Kara, discussing the “change in ownership,”.
6:30 - Welcoming out Walt and Kara… aaand here they are.
6:31 - Mossberg: “It’s been a turbulent year for a lot of these companies.” Swisher: “It’s been a big news year.” Indeed it has.
6:36 – They want to have a Bill + Steve redux, except this time the Steve is Ballmer, not Jobs. Playing the Gates retirement video from CES.
6:43 - Stiiiiiiiill playing the video. It’s still pretty good though, and they added a few new clips here and there.
6:46 – All done! Mossberg: Ladies and gentlemen, Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer!
6:47 - Taking it back to the beginning, what kind of classmate/roommate was Bill in college? “He was a pretty shy guy… quiet, kind of shy, but a certain kind of spark. Especially later in the day, early in the morning. Bill was usually going to bed by the time I was waking up.” Bill’s talking about how he constantly played hookey.
6:50 – Ballmer talking about how Gates came and went Harvard. Gates: “You can leave and come back!” Say, is that a hint about Bills retirement? Ballmer’s talking up his time spent at Procter and Gamble. Mossberg: Was it about then that you tried to hire Steve? Gates: “Not yet…” they were still way early on in the company.
6:53 - Mossberg: Did you wait to finish business school? Ballmer: “This is classic. Gates calls, ‘Hey, what are you doing? Oh, god, too bad you don’t have a twin brother or something…’ he didn’t just come out and say anything. ‘Too bad, too bad — and he hung up!’ That was the sales call!”
6:54 - Gates on the early days: “We had so many customers, so many choices about what we could do next. We’ve always managed the company very conservatively.” Talking anecdotally about how early-Microsoft wanted to have enough in the bank to pay its employees for a year if their customers stopped paying. “I had this very conservative view of our financial limits.”
6:57 - Ballmer: “I wondered, why did I leave Stanford business school for this?” Eventually Bill gave him the real pitch: “We can put a computer on everyone’s desk.” Gates: “I needed Steve. I needed the skills he had, I needed a partner.” Ballmer: “Bill said, ‘Prove we can hire one good guy, and we’ll hire 2-18′… and that became our management approach!” Ballmer says Microsoft hedges all its bets, takes all its risks technologically — “Why take financial risks?”
7:03 - Mossberg: There’s this perception that [Bill's] the technology guy, and [Steve's] the sales guy. Is that right? Bill: They’ve been jointly involved in a lot of crossover stuff, “Steve and I have done all this stuff together.” Ballmer: Discussing working on the Windows 1.0 as a project manager. (Remember that infomercial?) “I’m not an engineer!”
7:04 - Swisher: Would you call yourself a businessman? Gates: “Sure. Sales minus costs equals profits. Is there more?” Big laughter. Mossberg: Did it bug you that Bill blew up and became extremely famous? Ballmer: “No. … It was always clear Bill was the senior partner and I was the junior partner… it’s never bothered me at all.”
7:08 – Swisher: Do you still get veto on company decisions? Gates: “No.” Says he’s become the junior partner when he swapped roles with Ballmer. Mossberg asking about Bill’s participation these days and going forward. “It’s a very different role” he’s taking on. Ozzie and Mundie have stepped up, and he’s looking to Steve to help pick and choose his future projects.

7:12 - Ballmer: “I want to know what [Bill] thinks.” Swisher wants to talk Yahoo! Ballmer gives the quick rundown of events to date. “We are not rebidding for the company — we reserve the right to do so, but it’s not on the docket.” Swisher: What are you interested in, in Yahoo? Ha, they’re wheeling out a whiteboard for Ballmer to diagram his explanation. Swisher: “This is like crack for him.” Ballmer discussing ads, bidders, search, and the scale of it all. “To accelerate scale, it made sense for us to look at Yahoo!’s business.”
7:17 – Ballmer says they’re still in talks with Yahoo! about a “partnership.” Swisher mentions that Ballmer’s model of competing with Google is reminiscent of a monopoly. Ballmer gives the who, me? look. Gates: “Guys like us avoid monopolies because we compete!” Naturally, the lot of that exchange was all very tongue-in-cheek.
7:20 - Ballmer: “You need scale, you need business and technology innovation. Large and small… this is a funny marketplace in which to say you’re cheaper [than the competition].” Swisher: What’s the key element” Ballmer: “The most important thing is that we have a good team and that we’re patient.” And money — investment. Ballmer’s getting super intense. Mossberg: “You’re getting a little scary there.” Ballmer: “WELL, YOU GOT THE REAL ME!” Dude, this is Steve, what do you want?
7:24 – Mossberg wants to talk Vista. “Is Vista a failure? Is it a mistake?” Ballmer: “It’s not a failure, it’s not a mistake. Are there things we’ll modify and improve going forward? Sure.” Gates is mum, smiling off into the distance. Bet he can’t wait to wash his hands of this stuff.
7:26 - Ballmer: “Let me ask Bill…” is Vista up to your expectations compared to ‘95 and 3.0? Gates: “There’s no product that we’ve ever shipped that was 100% of what I wanted. That’s part of the magic of software, people give you feedback… and you get to make a new version. … We have a culture of ‘we need to do better.”
7:28 - Ballmer: “There are two unique things: in a lot of our Windows releases in the past, we’ve always had a second stream. With 95 we were introducing NT in the background… the number one thing people found jarring [with Vista] was that we changed the UI. … That was ironic.” Mossberg: Will you show us a little bit of Windows 7? Ballmer: “Sure! This is the smallest snippet of Windows 7. It’s just a small little snippet.’”
7:29 - “This is ‘likely to ship within three years of general availability of Vista.’” Demo time! It does multi-touch!
7:35 – They worked with the Surface team on the multi-touch stuff. Microsoft is re-thinking the whole user interface to better accommodate multi-touch for day to day use.
7:39 - Swisher and Mossberg: So, what does this represent? Is this the next phase of the way people will do day to day work on their computers? Gates: “We’re at an interesting junction… in the years to come, the roles of speech, vision, ink, all of those will become huge. I showed what an intelligent whiteboard would be like.”
7:43 - “For the person at home and the person at work, that interaction will change dramatically.” Talking about the single-user interfaces we have today. Mossberg: This is 15-18 months from release, your friends in Cupertino probably have one more turn before you get this out the door. They have the iPhone, which is on the market today… is there a risk that the work you’re doing here will look like they got there first? Ballmer: “There’s a lot in Windows 7, and our goal’s got to be, with our hardware partners, to produce fantastic PCs. … We’ll sell 270m PCs a year, and Apple will sell 10m. Apple is fantastically successful, and so are we.”
7:45 – Ballmer’s talking about Microsoft’s “real opportunity” to improve things in the future — which is another way of saying that things could be better, but there’s no real specific commitment to making the Windows experience better.
7:47 - Mossberg’s drilling Bill on the Mac vs. PC, Bill’s reticent. Ballmer: “Every share point Apple picks up is a share point we don’t like. … But it depends on what your goal is. We like selling 290m units. … Our model is better.” Mossberg: But you CAN’T be happy with this Vista situation? Ballmer: “What’s the appropriate response? I kind of like what Bill already said.” Gates: “You’re kind of repeating yourself.” Ouch. Big applause.
7:51 – Q from the internet: Do you feel the unsuccessful pursuit of Yahoo! has tarnished Microsoft at all? Ballmer: “No. … at very least, people now know we’re serious about our online business.”
7:53 - Talking about the phone market, Mossberg and Ballmer are debating unit volume between Nokia, RIM, Windows Mobile, Apple. On Android, Ballmer: “It’s another person taking another crack at the pie. … Google comes late, without experience, and no clear business model. … But we take them seriously.”
7:54 - Open floor for Gates as he transitions out of Microsoft: “It probably is the last time I’ll get to speak here…” Nawwwwww. “Melinda will be speaking Thursday, you’ll hear from here why this will be a fun journey.”
7:58 - Audience questions, but unfortunately none have been all that interesting so far.
8:02 – O’Reilly: You set out to put a computer on every desk — and you achieved that. So do you have a new audacious goal? Gates talking about the future and goals of how Microsoft thinks the future will look. Interactive TV, tablet PC, and so on.
8:08 – Question about apps in the browser, and what that means for the future of software. Ballmer doesn’t think it’s all or nothing.
Availability, price and employee familiarity often determines which operating systems are offered on dedicated servers. Variations of Linux (open-source operating systems), are often included at no charge to the customer. Commercial operating systems include Microsoft Windows Server, provided through a special program called Microsoft SPLA. Red Hat Enterprise is a commercial version of Linux offered to hosting providers on a monthly fee basis. The monthly fee provides OS updates through the Red Hat Network using an application called up2date. Other operating systems are available from the open source community at no charge. These include CentOS, Fedora Core, Debian, and many other Linux distributions or BSD systems FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD.
Support for any of the operating systems above typically depends on the level of management offered with a particular dedicated server plan. Operating system support may include updates to the core system in order to acquire the latest security fixes, patches, and system-wide vulnerability resolutions. Updates to core operating systems include kernel upgrades, service packs, application updates, and security patches that keep server secure and safe. Operating system updates and support relieves the burden of server management from the dedicated server owner.
Dedicated hosting server providers utilize extreme security measures to ensure the safety of data stored on their network of servers. Providers will often deploy various software programs for scanning systems and networks for obtrusive invaders, spammers, hackers, and other harmful problems such as Trojans, worms, and eggdrops (see “Limitations” below). Linux and Windows use different software for security protection.
Providers often bill for dedicated servers on a fixed monthly price to include specific software packages. Over the years, software vendors realized the significant market opportunity to bundle their software with dedicated servers. They have since started introducing pricing models that allow dedicated hosting providers the ability to purchase and resell software based on reduced monthly fees.
Microsoft offers software licenses through a program called the Service Provider License Agreement. The SPLA model provides use of Microsoft products through a monthly user or processor based fee. SPLA software includes the Windows Operating System, Microsoft SQL Server, Microsoft Exchange Server, Microsoft SharePoint and shoutcast hosting, and many other server based products.
Dedicated Server Providers usually offer the ability to select the software you want installed on a dedicated server. Depending on the overall usage of the server, this will include your choice of operating system, database, and specific applications. Servers can be customized and tailored specific to the customer’s needs and requirements.
Other software applications available are specialized web hosting specific programs called control panels. Control panel software is an all inclusive set of software applications, server applications, and automation tools that can be installed on a dedicated server. Control panels include integration into web servers, database applications, programming languages, application deployment, server administration tasks, and include the ability to automate tasks via a web based front end.
Most dedicated servers are packaged with a control panel. Control panels are often confused with management tools, but these control panels are actually web based automation tools created to help automate the process of web site creation and server management. Control panels should not be confused with a full server management solution by a dedicated hosting provider.
Theodore Maiman made the first laser operate on 16 May 1960 at the Hughes Research Laboratory in California, by shining a high-power flash lamp on a ruby rod with silver-coated surfaces. He promptly submitted a short report of the work to the journal Physical Review Letters, but the editors turned it down. Some have thought this was because the Physical Review had announced that it was receiving too many papers on masers—the longer-wavelength predecessors of the laser—and had announced that any further papers would be turned down. But Simon Pasternack, who was an editor of Physical Review Letters at the time, has said that he turned down this historic paper because Maiman had just published, in June 1960, an article on the excitation of ruby with light, with an examination of the relaxation times between quantum states, and that the new work seemed to be simply more of the same. Pasternack’s reaction perhaps reflects the limited understanding at the time of the nature of lasers and their significance. Eager to get his work quickly into publication, Maiman then turned to Nature, usually even more selective than Physical Review Letters, where the paper was better received and published on 6 August.
With official publication of Maiman’s first laser under way, the Hughes Research Laboratory made the first public announcement to the news media on 7 July 1960. This created quite a stir, with front-page newspaper discussions of possible death rays, but also some skepticism among scientists, who were not yet able to see the careful and logically complete Nature paper. Another source of doubt came from the fact that Maiman did not report having seen a bright beam of light, which was the expected characteristic of a laser. I myself asked several of the Hughes group whether they had seen a bright beam, which surprisingly they had not. Maiman’s experiment was not set up to allow a simple beam to come out of it, but he analyzed the spectrum of light emitted and found a marked narrowing of the range of frequencies that it contained. This was just what had been predicted by the theoretical paper on optical masers (or lasers) by Art Schawlow and myself, and had been seen in the masers that produced the longer-wavelength microwave radiation. This evidence, presented in figure 2 of Maiman’s Nature paper, was definite proof of laser action. Shortly afterward, both in Maiman’s laboratory at Hughes and in Schawlow’s at Bell Laboratories in New Jersey, bright red spots from ruby laser beams hitting the laboratory wall were seen and admired.
Maiman’s laser had several aspects not considered in our theoretical paper, nor discussed by others before the ruby demonstration. First, Maiman used a pulsed light source, lasting only a few milliseconds, to excite (or “pump”) the ruby. The laser thus produced only a short flash of light rather than a continuous wave, but because substantial energy was released during a short time, it provided much more power than had been envisaged in most of the earlier discussions. Before long, a technique known as “Q switching” was introduced at the Hughes Laboratory, shortening the pulse of laser light still further and increasing the instantaneous power to millions of watts and beyond. Lasers now have powers as high as a million billion (1015) watts! The high intensity of pulsed laser light allowed a wide range of new types of experiment, and launched the now-burgeoning field of nonlinear optics. Nonlinear interactions between light and matter allow the frequency of light to be doubled or tripled, so for example an intense red laser can be used to produce green light.
I had a busy job in Washington at the time when various groups were trying to make the earliest lasers. But I was also supervising graduate students at Columbia University who were trying to make continuously pumped infrared lasers. Shortly after the ruby laser came out I advised them to stop this work and instead capitalize on the power of the new ruby laser to do an experiment on two-photon excitation of atoms. This was one of the early experiments in nonlinear optics, and two-photon excitation is now widely used to study atoms and molecules.
Lasers work by adding energy to atoms or molecules, so that there are more in a high-energy (”excited”) state than in some lower-energy state; this is known as a “population inversion.” When this occurs, light waves passing through the material stimulate more radiation from the excited states than they lose by absorption due to atoms or molecules in the lower state. This “stimulated emission” is the basis of masers (whose name stands for “microwave amplification by stimulated emission of radiation”) and lasers (the same, but for light instead of microwaves).
Before Maiman’s paper, ruby had been widely used for masers, which produce waves at microwave frequencies, and had also been considered for lasers producing infrared or visible light waves. But the second surprising feature of Maiman’s laser, in addition to the pulsed source, was that he was able to empty the lowest-energy (”ground”) state of ruby enough so that stimulated emission could occur from an excited to the ground state. This was unexpected. In fact, Schawlow, who had worked on ruby, had publicly commented that transitions involving the ground state of ruby would not be suitable for lasers because it would be difficult to empty adequately. He recommended a different transition in ruby, which was indeed made to work, but only after Maiman’s success. Maiman, who had been carefully studying the relaxation times of excited states of ruby, came to the conclusion that the ground state might be sufficiently emptied by a flash lamp to provide laser action—and it worked.
The ruby laser was used in many early spectacular experiments. One amusing one, in 1969, sent a light beam to the Moon, where it was reflected back from a retro-reflector placed on the Moon’s surface by astronauts in the U.S. Apollo program. The round-trip travel time of the pulse provided a measurement of the distance to the Moon. Later, ruby laser beams sent out and received by telescopes measured distances to the Moon with a precision of about three centimeters—a great use of the ruby laser’s short pulses.
When the first laser appeared, scientists and engineers were not really prepared for it. Many people said to me—partly as a joke but also as a challenge—that the laser was “a solution looking for a problem.” But by bringing together optics and electronics, lasers opened up vast new fields of science and technology. And many different laser types and applications came along quite soon. At IBM’s research laboratories in Yorktown Heights, New York, Peter Sorokin and Mirek Stevenson demonstrated two lasers that used techniques similar to Maiman’s but with calcium fluoride, instead of ruby, as the lasing substance. Following that—and still in 1960—was the very important helium-neon laser of Ali Javan, William Bennett, and Donald Herriott at Bell Laboratories. This produced continuous radiation at low power but with a very pure frequency and the narrowest possible beam. Then came semiconductor lasers, first made to operate in 1962 by Robert Hall and his associates at the General Electric laboratories in Schenectady, New York. Semiconductor lasers now involve many different materials and forms, can be quite small and inexpensive, and are by far the most common type of laser. They are used, for example, in supermarket bar-code readers, in optical-fiber communications, and in laser pointers.
By now, lasers come in countless varieties. They include the “edible” laser, made as a joke by Schawlow out of flavored gelatin (but not in fact eaten because of the dye that was used to color it), and its companion the “drinkable” laser, made of an alcoholic mixture at Eastman Kodak’s laboratories in Rochester, New York. Natural lasers have now been found in astronomical objects; for example, infrared light is amplified by carbon dioxide in the atmospheres of Mars and Venus, excited by solar radiation, and intense radiation from stars stimulates laser action in hydrogen atoms in circumstellar gas clouds. This raises the question: why weren’t lasers invented long ago, perhaps by 1930 when all the necessary physics was already understood, at least by some people? What other important phenomena are we blindly missing today?
Maiman’s paper is so short, and has so many powerful ramifications, that I believe it might be considered the most important per word of any of the wonderful papers in Nature over the past century. Lasers today produce much higher power densities than were previously possible, more precise measurements of distances, gentle ways of picking up and moving small objects such as individual microorganisms, the lowest temperatures ever achieved, new kinds of electronics and optics, and many billions of dollars worth of new industries. The U.S. National Academy of Engineering has chosen the combination of lasers and fiber optics—which has revolutionized communications—as one of the twenty most important engineering developments of the twentieth century. Personally, I am particularly pleased with lasers as invaluable medical tools (for example, in laser eye surgery), and as scientific instruments—I use them now to make observations in astronomy. And there are already at least ten Nobel Prize winners whose work was made possible by lasers.
There have been great and good developments since Ted Maiman, probably a bit desperately, mailed off a short paper on what was then a somewhat obscure subject, hoping to get it published quickly in Nature. Fortunately, Nature’s editors accepted it, and the rest is history.

The Swiss bank UBS plans to cut 5,500 jobs after suffering a $10.9 billion first quarter loss due to the US sub-prime mortgage crisis.
The seven percent job loss will include as many as 2,600 positions at the securities division, the company said in a Tuesday statement.
UBS also said it planned to sell a $15 billion portfolio of sub-prime mortgages to a newly created fund managed by BlackRock Inc by the end of June.
Chief Executive Officer Marcel Rohner told analysts he expected ‘tough business conditions’, which has so far caused $38 billion of markdowns at the company, to continue, forcing the bank to ‘manage costs, resources and capacity very actively’.
UBS, Europe’s biggest victim of the sub-prime mortgage crisis, had earlier announced 1,500 job losses, which, together with the latest staff cuts, represent an 18-percent reduction of the company’s workforce since mid 2007.
Other leading companies have also announced job cuts due to the US credit crunch, which has led to markdowns and losses of $319 billion.
Citigroup Inc, which has suffered almost $41 billion from the sub-prime crisis, cut about 15,200 jobs while Merrill Lynch & Co reduced 5,220 positions.